The UK's 'witches' must never allow themselves to be taken alive
As mentioned in recent articles, I've been following current MAP events in the UK closely ever since reading its thoroughly Orwellian Crime and Policing Bill, now the Crime and Policing Act. Not long ago, I drafted an article of a length similar to my piece on America's evil hypocrisy, but for the sake of both brevity and focus, I've split that up into pieces and elaborated just a little.
Today's article will probably get me banned from ever entering the UK, but as that's one of the last places on Earth I'd choose to visit, let's go and get myself put on their naughty list!
Death for p(a)edos...
There has been an epidemic of murders in UK prisons, focused heavily on those convicted of crimes against children, which I will discuss right after the little detour below...
A consensual sexual encounter between an adult and a child or teen is essentially the opposite of a violent offense. It is something that should be regarded as an expression of love, not a horrific crime. Likewise, downloading criminalized images is an entirely victimless act if the images are essentially pirated, as is typical. But the anglosphere feels differently, and they see no difference whatsoever between these widely disparate acts. Hell, many anglo people would probably rather a kid be brutally murdered than have their dick sucked.
The inclusion of non-consensual cases and child murderers in this article is not an indication that I think such people are equivalent to those who have consensual sex with children or commit non-contact 'offenses'. And it most certainly is not an endorsement of violent acts against children. These cases are here because many anglo people see them all as exactly the same kind of act, and that is no doubt going to be reflected in how prisoners relate to 'offenders against children'.
Case #1 - Ian Watkins
Perhaps the most (in)famous recent child sex offender death is that of former rock star Ian Watkins. He was hardly a MAP, more a man who wanted to have sex with children purely for the deviance of the act. Nonetheless, he was labeled a 'p(a)edophile' by the media and by fellow prisoners. Indeed, one of his killers stated "this is what paedophiles deserve" before slashing the middle-aged man's throat, and according to prosecutors, the singer had "done nothing whatsoever to provoke this attack in the time leading up to it". Even worse, the killer had loudly protested about being imprisoned with 'paedophiles', had threatened to hurt as many as possible, and had even attacked three men he'd labeled as such the night before the murder. Whether the cause was staggering incompetence or prison officers who wanted to see men murdered, it's quite apparent that sex offenders in that prison are not even remotely safe.
The killer told the court:
Every prison officer I interacted with, I told them my disgust of sex offenders and said 'I can't be in this prison, I don't know how long I'm going to last.'
Every single time I assaulted someone, it was not minor. I was assaulting a lot of sex offenders...When you look at the situation, the response of the prison officers, they knew I was going to do it.
Case #2 - Kyle Bevan
Kyle Bevan was also not a MAP. He was a violent child-killer whom the world is better off without. However, his murder highlights how prisoners can attack with effective impunity. He was killed in the same prison as Ian Watkins, less than a month later, by three men that included someone informally known as "Wakefield Dexter", named after a TV show character who took matters into his own hands. Despite the nickname, the man remained on the same wing as vulnerable prisoners, and supervision was weak enough to allow him and his two accomplices to stalk Bevan and attack him in his cell, where they stabbed him 25 times before allowing him to slowly bleed to death.
What really stands out to me in this case is that two of the three killers had nothing to lose by attacking Bevan. They were already serving "whole-life orders", which means they would never be released from prison even with the best of behavior. In sentencing the men to whole-life orders again, the judge's actions were purely symbolic. These men can kill more fellow prisoners with zero consequences, improving their standing in the prison hierarchy in the process, and they even get a day or two out of prison for their trouble. Who will they kill next?
Case #3 - Richard Huckle
Richard Huckle was a MAP who went wild in Malaysia, allegedly 'raping' a number of young children. Given that both the laws and the media of the UK deem consensual acts 'rape', I don't recommend reading too much into such allegations; the sex may well have been consensual. But where this case really stands out is the sheer brutality of Huckle's murder. Wikipedia sums it up fairly well:
During the trial, further details of Huckle's murder were revealed with it being made public that Huckle endured a lengthy torture with his hands and feet bound before being gagged, strangled using electrical cable, raped, having his jaw broken, being sodomised with a kitchen utensil, and then having a pen with a blade attached stabbed into his brain via the nose.
The attack was described by the prosecution as "a prolonged attack also designed to humiliate and degrade Huckle". Fitzgerald, who was discovered by prison staff straddling Huckle's body and surrounded by a pool of blood, later admitted that he had wanted to cook and eat parts of Huckle's body following the attack. Fitzgerald reportedly told a psychiatrist that he planned to kill several other inmates afterwards, but was "having too much fun" attacking Huckle to stop.
This is what potentially awaits you as a MAP in a British prison. Don't let anyone take you there.
Repeating what needs to be repeated
If you're reading this blog as a British person who has merely downloaded modeling pictures, or watches legal age twinks, you may be asking how this applies to you. After all, you're not murdering or raping children. The problem is that to the British masses, there is simply no difference. A person who watches a video of an 18-year-old role-playing as a schoolgirl is no different to someone who rapes a 5-year-old, because what matters is the 'deviance', and that 'deviance' is measured by something far removed from biological reality or any semblance of harm, based on a mantra as wild and backward as could be.
So what should you do?
I probably shouldn't tell you to go out and buy a gun to use, even if the UK's licensing system was proven easily fabricated by the fallen and severely misguided MAP Nicholas Prosper. Hell, I shouldn't even tell you to use a knife, or sword, or 'bladed article' as the UK's decrepit white legislators would call it. But I'm also not going to tell you to just let yourself be dragged away and sentenced to a term of potential bullying, torture, and death. And given the new regulation that will require all registered child sex offenders to notify police before they enter any place a child might be present, I can't in good conscience suggest submitting even when a prison sentence is more or less off the table.
You must do whatever you can to protect yourself should the monsters come for you. Still, as I can't and won't tell you to be violent, you'll have to figure out how to resist all by yourself. As the saying goes, as poorly translated from Spanish as it may be, better to die standing than to live on your knees.