There's never a dull moment in pedo activism. Except, of course, for those frequent dull moments when nothing is happening, where you're sipping your favorite gin and wondering when the revolution will start. Which reminds me... I should do a post about gin, partly because I love the stuff, but also because there are so many options that are not British these days, and one should never give their money to the bastards that started the whole pedopanic.

Anyway, the tech-literate yet linguistically challenged Patrick is back at it, with a new article on how he discovered an alleged connection between legal MAP sites that have been around for the last three or four decades. I hardly think anything in his article a revelation, but his latest attack on my beautiful name did give me some talking points for a post. Here goes...

'Asking for it'

The new article, which fell pretty flat on Reddit this time, has a few screenshots of mine. One of them is from 2006, when I was still a teenager myself. Do I have a stalker? The only 'gotcha' that piqued any sort of interest on r/Epstein was my comment about being hot for a provocative boy (thankfully, nobody condemned my interest in cute butts, so I can sleep easy as a butt man tonight). My statement was taken as me believing that the boy "was asking for it", which is... not what I thought.

My post, in full:

One of my favorite boys at work is such a little tease.

One thing he likes to do is give friends a peek at his underwear. Yesterday, when we were figuring out teams for a sports game, he insisted that he should be on a certain team because of the color of his underwear. He pulled the front of his pants forward to show us all.

Now, I'll admit I have kind of a crush on him anyway. He has a beautiful face and a super cute little butt. But him being such a 'perv' on top drives me wild.

What do you prefer, 'pure' kids or provocative kids?

The hysterical interpretation:

This one is interesting. It follows the same mindset many men have on women, they're "asking for it" based on actions that are not at all sexual. Even calling him a "perv" while he's fawning over a child. The fact that an adult man attracted to adult women and an adult man attracted to male children both fall into the trap of "If I'm turned on then they're asking for it" is very interesting to me. [...]

I'm fairly confident the boy has never had any interest in a sexual encounter with me, and that the fantasies of some wild passionate fling (and believe me, they were wild!) were mine alone. Of course, you never know for sure, unless you want to argue that minors are never attracted to adults, or that they're all 100% straight. The boy's provocativeness was... provocative, designed to provoke a reaction, with that reaction presumably being a laugh rather than a blow job from Mr. Ribbon. And yet, that doesn't mean it wasn't sexy as hell to a boylover such as myself.

Still, the claim that my post indicated a delusion of the boy desperately wanting sex with me, based on the fact that some teleiophilic men think women are begging for it, is endlessly intriguing. I have long suspected that teleiophilic men are projecting the worst of themselves onto pedophiles, as is common in how majority groups relate to the subjugated. This is a beautiful example of that very process in action.

The second quote that interests me goes as follows:

Even watching a child play he considers "sexy", further proving that he has no intention of some imagined "platonic" relationship with these victims.

Not fair man! And this is very much connected to the former point, of teleiophilic men projecting their behavior onto MAPs. Why? Because it is quite possible for any decent person to be sexually attracted to someone and still maintain a platonic relationship. Can a regular adult-attracted man, gay or straight, not maintain a friendship with a sexually attractive adult without making an unwanted pass? Can adults not work with other adults without foisting themselves upon the weaker ones?

You can be a pro-c NOMAP

One thing I want to make clear to people, both MAP and non-MAP, is that it's absolutely possible to be philosophically pro-choice but not have sex with those under the age of consent. Both inside and outside of the community, too many people react as if labeling yourself pro-c means you're having sex with kids. That just isn't true at all. Given the potentially extreme consequences of AMSC for both minor and adult, not inherent but a result of society's dirty little lies, many MAPs are both pro-choice and yet still non-contact. Philosophy and action need not be the same.

In fact, I would argue that being pro-c and non-contact is peak morality, submitting oneself to a monk-like existence despite being lucid of the fact that harm from consensual AMSC is secondary (in other words, dreamed up and constructed almost entirely from thin air). The polar opposite of this morality, at the black end of the scale, would be the VirPed admins who espoused anti-contact views philosophically but committed contact sex offenses anyway.

Clarifying the need for peer support

Brian argues that without sites like his, more offenders will move to the real world to commit their perversions. That argument is completely shadowed by the fact that he's apart of an infrastructure actively encouraging struggling pedophiles to not only surround themselves with children, but that their attraction is normal and should be encouraged.

That's not exactly what I said. I stated that without peer support, MAPs are at greater risk for a variety of negative outcomes. This is not inherent to being a MAP, rather it is a result of the constant bullying, silly laws that hurt MAPs but don't protect kids, and the impossibility of getting safe and affirming support anywhere other than on MAP resources. These negative outcomes could be sexual in nature, harmful to oneself, or they could be violent as we saw with Nicholas Prosper and Dezi Freeman; the former was in fact banned from MAP spaces shortly before he committed mass murder. Relentlessly hounding a group of people and leaving them with nowhere to go is clearly an incredibly stupid idea for many reasons, and there really is not anywhere else for MAPs to go.

Telling MAPs that their sexual orientation is normal is a good antidote to the aforementioned issues; besides, what would be the point in telling someone they're crazy and should be ashamed of something they cannot change? People like Patrick want MAPs to suffer for their own sadistic satisfaction, even if the outcomes are potentially catastrophic.

Encouraging other MAPs to surround themselves with children might be a tad more controversial, but in my case, it leads to a lower sex drive and a stronger mentoring instinct, so I'm content with my decision to advocate it.

What makes America special?

Patrick is upset that France has announced investigations, while the US hasn't done anything. But why would the US, as opposed to the other 200+ countries in the world, have a particular need to act? The sites are not based in America, there is no clear evidence that the user base is predominantly American, and they would be protected by the first amendment anyway.

Alas, antis often reveal themselves as cultural imperialists with a penchant for American exceptionalism. The comment on my piece about France revealed the same mindset, stating that minors cannot consent, as if the age of majority is the age of consent everywhere just because it is so in America. Of course, it should hardly come as much of a surprise that those who seek to bully the most subjugated group of adults in the world would also push for the most powerful country in the world to boss the weaker ones around.

And so...

I'm content with what I'm doing as a MAP activist. In fact, articles criticizing our community will only ever make me push back harder and try to spread my message more widely. Furthermore, when people come under attack, even if that attack has little chance of succeeding, it's natural for them to look at what alternatives they might have, and this only makes them stronger at the end of the day. I had forgotten about my pledge to recruit darknet MAPs to the cause, and I thank Patrick very much for the reminder in his original article. To that end, I have made a request for captcha-less access to such a site, allowing entirely lawful participation with images fully disabled in the browser. I understand that this is being considered.

I ask my MAP readers to thoroughly stick it to our detractors and help spread our messages far and wide, both inside and outside of the community. Share my articles and their talking points wherever you go, provided you can do so safely. There's a huge reservoir of information here, on Mu, and on Yesmap Wiki. It needs to be out there!